Post by LanceI have grave doubts that the introduction of a gender neutral
pronoun will make much difference to sexism.
Zulu has no gendered pronouns but sexism is certainy present in
Zulu society. Finish has no gendered pronouns (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutrality_in_genderless_languages)
but sexism is probably worse than in Sweden.
I doubt that anyone would claim that neutral pronouns will eliminate
sexism. However, the simple fact is that it is grammatically unjust -
grammatically demeaning - that a male noun or pronoun may signify both
men and women, but the corresponding female noun or pronoun may not.
If "man", "men", and "mankind" can signify both men and women, then
why shouldn't "woman", "women", or "womankind" signify both women and
men? If "he" can signify either a man or a woman, then why shouldn't
"she" signify either a woman or a man? Justice is an absolute
principle that demands strictness. There might be some practical
delays in the achievement of justice, but there can be no exceptions
in respect to recipients and modes.